ADAPTIVE ABILITY OF INTRODUCED POTATO ACCESSIONS BY YIELD CAPACITY IN POLISSIA REGION OF UKRAINE

Article language

українська

Print date

22.12.22

Date posted online

14.05.2023

Institution

Institute of Potato Growing of NAAS

Bibliography

1. Elsayed S, El-Hendawy S, Khadr M, Elsherbiny O, Al-Suhaibani N, Dewir YH. 2021. Integration of spectral reflectance indices and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for assessing the growth performance and yield of potato under different drip irrigation regimes. Chemosensors. 9: 55. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ chemosensors9030055

2. Faostat. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Database. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Осt 20]. Available from:  http://www.fao. org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

3. Bach S, Yada RY, Bizimungu B, Sullivan JA. 2012. Genotype by environment interaction effects on fibre components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica. 187: 77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0734-9

4. Birch PRJ, Bryan G, Fenton B, Gilroy E, Hein I, Jones JT, Prashar А, Taylor MА, Torrance L, Ian K, Toth IK. 2012. Crops that feed the world. Potato: are the trends of increased global production sustainable? Food Security. 4: 477-508. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0220-1

5. Nyska IM. 2017.  Sources of spring barley resistance to biotic and abiotic factors. Visnyk Tsentru Naukovoho Zabezpechennia APV Kharkivskoi oblasti. 23: 133-140.

6. Borivskyi AF. 2016. Adaptability and potential properties of varieties selected by the Institute of Potato Breeding of the National Academy of Sciences. Sortovyvchennia ta Okhorona Prav na Sorty Roslyn. 1: 89-95.

7. Podhaietskyi AA, Kovalenko VM. 2011. Adaptability of potato varieties of Belarusian breeding. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu.  4: 143-147.

8. Podhaietskyi AA. 2014. Adaptation and its significance for selection and production of agricultural crops, including potatoes. Kartopliarstvo Ukrainy. 1-2: 10-16.

9. Minhas JS. 2012. Potato: production strategies under abiotic stress. Weinheim. P. 1155-1167. doi: 10.1002/9783527632930.ch45

10. Hijmans RJ. 2003. The effect of climate change on global potato production. American Journal of Potato Research. 80: 271-279. doi: 10.1007/bf02855363 

11. Sonets TD, Zakharchuk NA. 2020. Assessment of the adaptability of potato varieties in the Polissia and Forest-Steppe zones. In: Modern problems of agriculture and forestry in the context of global climate change (11 March 2020). Proceedings of All-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference; 2020 Mar 11; Zhytomyr, Ukraine. Zhytomyr. P. 121-123.

12. Kravchenko NV. 2017. Adaptive potential of backcrosses of interspecific potato hybrids. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu.  9: 130-134.

13. Bondarchuk AA, Vermenko YuYa, Chernokhatov LV. 2013. Assessment of the adaptive capacity of potato varieties for irrigation in the Southern Steppe zone of Ukraine. Kyiv: KVITS. 28 p.

14. Leshchuk NV. 2017. Comparative analysis of statistical software products for the qualification examination of plant varieties for suitability for distribution. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 13. 4: 429-435. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.13.4.2017.117757.

15. Ushkarenko VO. 2013. Statistical analysis of the results of field experiments in agriculture. Erson: Ailant. 378 p.

16. Bondarchuk AA, Koltunov VA, Oliinyk TM, Furdyha MM, Vyshnevska OV, Osypchuk AA, Kupriianova TM, Zakharchuk NA. Bondarchuk AA, Koltunova VA, editors. 2019. Potato growing: experimentation methodology. Vinnytsia:TOV:”Тvory”. 652 р. 

Section

INTRODUCTION

Abstract

Aim. Adaptive capacity determination of introduced potato samples based on yield uder conditions of Ukraine Polissia. 
Results and Discussion. Adaptive capacity of introduced potato samples was studied by yield capacity uder conditions of Ukraine Polissia. The varieties Mia (673 g/bush),
Madeleine (763 g/bush), Connect (717 g/bush) and Harmonia (715 g/bush) showed high yield capacity. Insignificant and moderate variability of the average productivity of potato varieties was observed in:
Prada (V-9.8%), Merlot (V-9.5%), Soncedar (V-8.8%), Bazhana (Barska Bila) (V-9,1%), Volodarka (V-7.2%), Bohach (V-3.1%), Mia (V-17.0%), Evolution (V-18.1%), 
Opillia (V-18.8%), Palats (V-16.1%), Baklazhan (V-15.4%), Tradytsiia (V-12.2%), Avangard (V-19.9%). The following varieties and species showed high adaptive potential: Mia (96.9), Evolution (100.2), Madeleine (187.4), Prada (9.4), Pershotsvet (55.4),Orchestra (91.3) , Soraya (30.6), Taurus (101.9), Granada
(115.3), Soncedar (113.5), Zhytnytsa (109.3), Bazhana (Barska bila) (33.7), Queen Anne (63.8), Harmoniia (152.0), Folvar (45.1), Volare (87.4), Rodynna
(136.0), Volodarka (38.9), Toscana (65.2), Balabai (127 ,1), Purpurnyi glaz (107.9), Photynia (149.3), Tradytsiia (156.0), Alliance (69.4), Avangard
(21.6), Volat (151.9), Dubrava (5,2), Lad (18.6), Connect (195.1) Rudolph (124.3). 
Conclusions. The most stable by yield to the average year indicator of the corresponding ripeness group were the samples: Mia, Evolution, Madeleine, Prada,
Pershotsvet, Orchestra, Soraya, Taurus, Granada, Soncedar, Zhytnytsia, Bazhana (Barska bila), Queen Anne, Harmony, Falvar, Volare, Rodynna, Volodarka, Toscana,
Balabai, Purpurnyi glaz, Fotinia, Tradytsiia, Alliance, Avangard, Volat, Dubrava, Lad, Connect, Rudolph.
 
 
 
 
 

Keywords

potato, introduced accessions, adaptability, yield, breeding value, stability