Press Enter to search, Esc to cancel

SOURCES OF HIGH YIELD AND STABILITY FOR SPRING BARLEY BREEDING

Article language

українська

Print date

23.12.2025

Date posted online

07.04.2026

Institution

Yuriev Plant Production Institute of NAAS

Bibliography

  1. Infohrafichnyi dovidnyk «Аgrobiznes Ukrayiny 2024/2025». Crédit Agricole, ADAMA, Latifundist.com, TOP/LEAD. 2025. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 20]. Available from: https://agribusinessinukraine.com/ get_file/id/agrobiznesukraini2025fin.pdf
  2. Laidig F, Feike T, Klocke B, Macholdt J, Miedaner T, Rentel D, Piepho HP. 2021. Longterm breeding progress of yield, yield‑related, and disease resistance traits in five cereal crops of German variety trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 134(12): 3805-3827. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03929-5
  3. Kyrychenko VV, Vasko NI, Leonov OYu, Shchypak HV, Suvorova KYu, Morhun OV. 2022. Current strategy of cereal breeding. Sel Nasinn. 122: 100-112. doi: 10.30835/2413­7510.2022.271759
  4. Rodrigues O, Minella E, Costenaro ER. 2020. Genetic improvement of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Brazil: yield increase and associated traits. Agricultural Sciences. 11(04): 425-438. doi: 10.4236/as.2020.114025
  5. Rodrigues O, Minella E, Costenaro ER, Scariotto S, Marchese JA. 2022. Improvement in Brazilian barley bree­ding: changes in developmental phases and ecophysiological traits. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13: 1032243. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1032243
  6. Laidig F, Feike T, Hadasch S, Rentel D, Klocke B, Miedaner T, Piepho HP. 2022. Breeding progress of disease resistance and impact of disease severity under natural infections in winter wheat variety trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 134(5): 1281-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03728-4
  7. Zetzsche H, Friedt W, Ordon F. 2020. Breeding progress for pathogen resistance is a second major driver for yield increase in German winter wheat at contrasting N levels. Scientific Reports. 10(1): 20374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77200-0
  8. Yiğit A, Chmielewski FM. 2024. A deeper insight into the yield formation of winter and spring barley in relation to weather and climate variability. Agronomy. 14(7): 1503. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071503
  9. Kumari AN, Ram KK. 2023. Physiological and yield characteristics of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes subjected to drought stress. Annals of Biology. 39(2): 362-369.

10.  Visioni A, Basile B, Amri A, Sanchez Garcia M, Corrado G. 2023. Advancing the conservation and utilization of barley genetic resources: insights into germplasm management and breeding for sustainable agriculture. Plants. 12(18): 3186. doi: 10.3390/plants12183186

11.  Serrago RA, García GA, Savin R, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA. 2025. Relevance of grain number and grain weight on barley yield responses to environmental and genetic factor. Field Crops Research.  328(1): 109922. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109922

12.  Marone D, Russo MP, Mores A, Ficco DBM, Laidò G, Mastrangelo AM, Borrelli GM. 2021. Importance of landraces in cereal breeding for stress tolerance. Plants. 10. doi: 10.3390/plants10071267 

13.  Yang J, Ahmed HGM.D, Akram M, Iqbal R, Alwahibi MS, Elshikh MS, Zeng Y. 2025. Drought-induced trait correlations in barley genotypes through a multi-trait selection approach. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 23(3). doi: 10.15666/aeer/2303_56575674

14.  Lenartowicz T. Bujak H. Przystalski M. Piecuch K. Jończyk K. Feledyn-Szewczyk B. 2024. Yield stability and adaptability of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties in polish organic field trials. Agronomy. 14(9): 1963.  doi: 10.3390/agronomy14091963

15.  Saretto F, Roy B, Coelho RE, Reder A, Fedele G, Oakes R, Brandimarte L, Lourenço TC. 2024. Impacts of climate change and adaptation strategies for rainfed barley production in the Almería Province, Spain. Atmosphere. 15(5): 606.  doi: 10.3390/atmos15050606

16.  Kaminska V., Buslayeva N. 2021. Productivity of spring barley depending on the weather conditions and the level of intensification of growing technology. Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 99(5): 30-37. doi: 10.31073/agrovisnyk202105-04

17.  Kyrylchuk A.M., Shcherbynina N.P., Chukhleb C.L. 2023. Barley – status and ways of increase grain production. Taurida Scientific Herald. 2023. 131:90-103. doi: 10.32702/2226-0099.2023.131.11

18.  Kim YG, Park HH, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Kuk YI. 2022. Growth, yield, and grain quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown across South Korean farmlands with different temperature distributions. Agronomy. 12(11): 2731. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12112731

19.  Abdelghamy A, Lamlom SF, Naser M. 2024. Dissecting the resilience of barley genotypes under multiple adverse environmental conditions. BMC Plant Biology. 24(1): 16. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04704-20.

20.  Hudzenko VM, Lysenko AA, Polishchuk TP, Buniak NM, Kuzmenko YA, Yurchenko TV, Khudolii LV, Kokhovska IV. 2025. Genetic sources of yield and stability for winter barley breeding under conditions of the Ukrainian Forest-Steppe. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 21(1): 25-38. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.21.1.2025.327499

21.  Solonechnyi P, Kozachenko M, Vasko N, Gudzenko V, Ishenko V, Kozelets G. Usova N, Logvinenko Yu, Vinyukov A. 2018. AMMI and GGE biplot analisys of yield performance of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties in multi environment trials. Agriculture & Forestry. 64(1): 121-132. doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.64.1.15

22.  Nesa NU, Das A, Sagor GHM. 2025. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for selection of some high yielding terminal heat stress tolerant wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes in Bangladesh. Agric Res. 14: 436-451. doi: 10.1007/s40003-024-00791-x

23.  Vasylenko AO, Sichkar VI, Shevchenko LM, Vus NO, Solonechnyi PM, Silenko SI, Solomonov RV, Serduk VI, Gyantsev AV. 2025. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in environmental trials of pea cultivars. Plant Breeding & Seed Production. 127: 42-55. doi: 10.30835/2413-7510.2025.333727

24.  Dang X, Hu X, Ma Y, Li Y, Kan W, Dong X. 2024. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for genotype × environment interactions affecting the yield and quality characteristics of sugar beet. Peer Journal.12. e16882. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16882

25.   Methodology for qualifying examination of plant varieties for suitability for dissemination in Ukraine. Methods for determining crop quality indicators. Kyiv: UIESR. 2016. 159 p. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 20]. Available from: https://sops.gov.ua/psp

26.  Gabriel KR. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika. 58(3): 453-467.

  1. Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheny Q, Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science. 40: 597-605. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x  

28.  Gauch HG. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science. 46: 1488–1500. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193

29.  Purchase JL, Hatting H, Vandeventer CS. 2000. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 17: 101-107. doi: 10.1080/02571862. 2000. 10634878

Section

SOURCES AND DONORS

Abstract

Aim. The study aimed to investigate the adaptive potential of 20 spring barley cultivars in the eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine and to identify the most promising starting material for breeding programs.

Results and Discussion. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis identified several cultivars with high grain yields, specifically cvs. 'Elf', 'Svitoch', 'Troian', and 'Zakhysnyk'. High yield stability across the years was observed in cvs. 'Podyv', 'Balzam', 'Elf', 'Iner', and 'Zakhysnyk'. Based on the Genotype Selection Index (GSI), cvs. 'Iner', 'Podyv', and 'Zakhysnyk' were selected. In the GGE biplot model, cvs. 'Troian', 'Elf', 'Iner', and 'Zakhysnyk' were the closest to the "ideal genotype"; therefore, these cultivars are promising starting materials for spring barley breeding.

Conclusions. The identified spring barley cultivars (by yield level: cvs. 'Elf', 'Troian', 'Iner', and 'Zakhysnyk'; by stability: cvs. 'Podyv', 'Balzam', 'Elf', 'Iner', and'Zakhysnyk') represent valuable starting materials for breeding programs. Cultivars that differ in their response to contrasting environmental conditions during the study years can complement one another in commercial production to stabilize total output. Genotypes close to the "ideal" (cvs. 'Elf', 'Troian', 'Zakhysnyk', and 'Iner') combine high yield capacity with stress tolerance and are recommended for stable spring barley production.

Keywords

spring barley, sources, yield, adaptability, stability, starting material, breeding