STUDY OF SAMPLES OF THE SPECIES SOLANUM TUBEROSUM SUBSP. ANDIGENUM (JUZ. & BUKASOV) HAWKES OF THE POTATO GENE POOL COLLECTION FOR ECONOMICALLY VALUABLE TRAITS

Article language

українська

Print date

13.08.24

Date posted online

23.11.2024

Institution

Institute of Potato Growing of NAAS

Bibliography

1. Spooner DM, Ghislain M, Simon R, Jansky SH, Gavrilenko T. 2014. Systematics, diversity, genetics, and evolution of wild and cultivated potatoes. Botanical Review. 80 (4):283-383. doi: 10.1007/s12229-014-9146-y
2. Van der Berg R, Groendijk-Wilders N, authors; Navarre R, Pavek M, editors. 2014. Taxonomy. In: The Potato: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, Surrey. p. 12-28.
3. Ross Kh. 1989. Potato breeding. Problems and prospects. Moscow: Agropromizdat. 184 р.
4. Ghislain M, Andrade D, Rodriguez F, Hijmans RJ, Spooner DM. 2006. Genetic analysis of the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum L. Phureja Group using RAPDs and nuclear SSRs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 113:1515-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0399-7
5. Zimmerer KS. 1991. The regional biogeography of native potato cultivars in highland Peru. Journal of  Biogeography. 18:165-178. doi: 10.2307/2845290
6. Ovchinnikova A, Krylova E, Gavrilenko T, Smekalova T, Zhuk M, Knapp S, Spooner DM. 2011. Taxonomy of cultivated potatoes (Solanum section Petota: Solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.165(2): 107-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01107.x.
7. Spooner DM, McLean K, Ramsay G, Waugh R, Bryan GJ. 2005. A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphisms genotyping. Proceedings of the National Academyof Science (PNAS). 102(41):14694-14699. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0507400102
8. Hawkes JG, Francisco-Ortega J, 1992. The potato in Spain during the late 16th century. Economic Botany. 46: 86-97. doi:10.1007/BF02985257
9. Mario Coca-Morante, Ismael Tolнn-Tordoya. 2013 The Potato Late Blight Caused by Phytophthora infestans Mont de Bary as Selection Factor of Phurejas Potatoes (Solanum phureja Juz et Buk) in Endemic Areas of the Bolivian Andes. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 4(1): 53-58. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.41009

10.   Feingold SE, Massa GA, Norero NS, Lorenzen J. 2010. Initiatives on potato functional genetics. The Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology. 4:79-89.

11.  Giraldo D, Juarez H, Pé1`rez W, Trebejo I, Yzarra W, Forbes G. 2010. Severity of potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in agricultural areas of Peru associated with climate change. Revista Peruana Geo-Atmosfйrica 2:56-67.

12.  Jo KR, Kim CJ, Kim SJ, Kim TK, Bergervoet M, Jongsma MA, Visser RGF, Jacobsen E, Vossen JH. 2014. Development of late blight resistant potatoes by cisgene stacking. BMC Biotechnology. 14(50). doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-50

13.  Vélez JM, Pineda R, Galindo L, Arango R, Morales JG. 2016. Current situation of wild Solanum spp. L. sect. Petota (Solanum, Solanaceae) in some Colombian regions. Genetшс Resourсes and Crop Evolution. 63(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10722-015-0234-6

14.  Spooner D.M, Ghislain M, Simon R, Jansky SH, Gavrilenko T. 2014. Systematics, diversity, genetics, and evolution of wild and cultivated potatoes. The Botanical Review. 80. Р. 283-383. doi: 10.1007/s12229-014-9146-y.

15.  Mangal V, Sood S, Kumar A, Singh B. 2023. Characterization of Andigena accessions for biotic stress resistance using linked molecular markers. Potato Journal. 50(1): 55-65.

16.  Bachmann-Pfabe S, Hammann T, Kruse J, Dehmer KJ. 2019. Screening of wild potato genetic resources for combinedresistance to late blight on tubers and pale potato cystnematodes. Euphytica. 215. 48. doi:10.1007/s10681-019-2364-y

17.  Berdugo-Cely J, Valbuena RI, Sánchez-Betancourt E, Barrero LS, Yockteng R. 2017. Genetic diversity and association mapping in the Colombian Central Collection of Solanum tuberosum L. Andigenum group using SNPs markers. PLoS One. 3. 12(3): e0173039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173039.

18.  Ghislain M, Douches DS. 2020. The Genes and Genomes of the Potato. The Potato Crop. 1: 139-162. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-28683-5_5

19.  Bondus RO, Kharchenko YuV, Riabchun VK, Bohuslavskyi RL, Zadorozhna OA, Dokukina KI, Podhaietskyi AA, Furdyha MM, Hordiienko VV, Koval VS, Hordiienko OV. 2020. Methodological recommendations for the formation of potato gene pool collections.  Ustymivka: Printing shop SP TOV «Khrystyianska Zoria». 68 p.

20.  Landeo JA. 1982. Heterosis and combining ability of Solanum tuberosum Group Andigena haploids. Potato Research. 25: 227-237.

21.  Krug H. 1974. Untersuchungen zur Fruhselektion in der Kartoffelzuchtung. I. Untersuchungen an der Samlingsgeneration. Zeitscrift für Pflanzenzuchtg. 73: 141-162.

22.   Podhaietsk AA, Bondus RO, Kravchenko NV. 2014. Performance of potato varieties depending on trial locations. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu. Series Ahronomiia i Biolohiia. 3 (27): 220-224.

23.  Podhaietskyi AA, Horbas SM. 2013. A possibility of selection of high-starch forms among offspring from crossing interspecies potato hybrids. Visnyk Sumskoho Natsionalnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu. Series Ahronomiia i Biolohiia. 3(25): 224-228.

24.  Maris B. 1969.  Studies on maturity, yield, under-water weight and some other characteristics of potato progenies. Euphytica. 18: 287-319.

Section

Abstract

Aim. To screen a Solanum andigenum Juz. et Buk collection for the expression of economically valuable traits and to identify sources of high performance, its constituents, and starch content in tubers.

Results and Discussion. One hundred and eleven Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigenum (Juz. & Bukasov) Hawkes accessions of the potato gene pool collection of the Institute of Potato Growing of NAAS were evaluated for performance and its constituents as well as for starch content in tubers. Of the investigated material, forms performing better than reference varieties were identified. Accessions ‘Uk 251-111 (UM0102409)’, ‘Uk 251-47 (UM0102369)’, ‘Uk 251-141 (UM0102431)’, ‘Uk 251-140 (UM0102430)’, ‘P1/27 (UM0102435)’, ‘A 8-2424 (UM0102436)’, and ‘Uk 251-56 (UM01023446)’ are promising for this trait-oriented hybridization. In addition, accessions with strong expression of such performance constituents as the number of tubers per bush and the average marketable tuber weight were identified. The average marketable tuber weight in accessions ‘Uk 251-47 (UM0102369)’ and ‘Uk 251-16 (UM0102351)’ was 110.7 g and 233.3 g, respectively. Thus, these forms can be recommended for hybridization to saturate backcrosses of multispecies hybrids and interspecies hybrids with useful traits. The proportion of high-starch forms (starch content in tubers > 22 %) in the S. andigenum species collection was 13 %. Accessions with high starch content in tubers, especially in combination with increased performance, are valuable for practical breeding.

Conclusions. Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigenum (Juz. & Bukasov) Hawkes accessions of the potato gene pool collection, which were grown in the Ukrainian woodlands, were evaluated for the major economically valuable characteristics. Sources of economically valuable characteristics, which are recommended to involve in practical breeding to create initial materials, were identified.

Keywords

potato, sources, productivity, starch content in tubers, interspecific hybridisation