THE NEW COMMON TOMATO ACCESSIONS OF THE STRAIN TEST NURSERY

Article language

Українська, Русский, English

Print date

11.06.18

Date posted online

25.07.2018

Institution

common tomato, breeding, variety, yield, evenness of ripening, marketability

Bibliography

Danailov Zh. 2009. Achievements and prospects of tomato breeding in Bulgaria. Selek Semen. 6: 28-33.

Avdeev YuA, Ivanova LY, Avdeev AYu. 2004. Varieties of tomato for transportation and canning. In: Teoreticheskie i prikladnye issledovaniia po ovoshchnym kulturam: monography. Vserosiiskii nauchno-issledovatelskii instytut oroshaemogo ovoshchevodstva i bakhchevodstva. VNIIOOB; AGU. Astrakhan: Agrovnedrenie. p. 253-255.

Zurabian VE, Martyrosian HS, Kazarin AK. 2016. Application of intervariety hybridization in tomato breeding. In:Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiia agrarnogo kompleksa. p. 878-880.

Vozhehova RA, editor. 2014. Methods of field and laboratory investigations on irrigated lands. Ed. Kherson: Hrin DS. p. 154-158, 202-211.

Methodical guidelines for studying and maintaining the world collection of vegetable solanaceous crops (tomato, pepper, eggplant). Leningrad: VYR; 1977. 36 с.

Methodical guidelines for breeding of varieties and heterosis hybrids of vegetable crops. 1974. Leningrad: VYR; 214 p.

Kravchenko VA, Prylipka OP. 2001. Methods and techniques of tomato breeding. Kyiv: Ahrarna Nauka. 84 p.

Bondarenko HL, Yakovenko KI., editors. 2001. Methods of experimentation in vegetable and melon growing. Kharkiv: Osnova. 369 p.

CMEA’s expanded harmonized classifier and CMEA’s international classifier for the genus Lycopersicon esculentum L. 1988. Leningrad: NTS SÉV, VYR YS i ARR(PNR). 33 p.

Guidelines for approbation of vegetable crops and fodder root crops. 1982. Moscow: Kolos. p. 10-17.

Methods of expert evaluation of varieties for distinctness, homogeneity and stability (DHS). Protection of rights to plant varieties. 2004. 1 (2). 252 p.

 

Ushkarenko VO, Vozhehov RA, Holoborodk SP, Kokovikhi SV. 2013. Statistical analysis of data of agricultural field experiments. Kherson: Ailant. 378 p.

Section

SOURCES AND DONORS

Abstract

Goal. To evaluate breeding accessions of common tomato for major economically valuable traits, to select the most valuable ones for further breeding.Results and discussion. The article presents the results of studying common tomato accessions in the main variety trial nursery at the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture in 2011 – 2015, which were used in breeding to create new high-yielding common tomato varieties. Lines L 348 № 2274(82.5 t/ha), L 394 (77.1 t/ha), L 396 (75.3 t/ha), L 352 (75.3 t/ha), L 86 (76.5 t/ha) were the best in terms of the total yield, which exceeded those of varieties Naddniprianskyi 1 and Lahidnyi (standards) by 10 – 21 % and 19 – 30 %, respectively. The evenness of ripening in these accessions was 81 – 87 %; the fruit marketability - 83 – 93 %. New intensive variety Yuvileinyi and promising lines Preliudiia and Kometa were characterized.Conclusions. Promising common tomato lines created at the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture have a high potential performance and are adapted to the southern steppe of Ukraine, which allows using them in breeding to create new varieties of this crop, which would not be inferior to the world analogues.

Keywords

common tomato, breeding, variety, yield, evenness of ripening, marketability