Нажмите Enter для поиска, Esc для отмены


Article language

Українська, Русский, English

Print date


Date posted online



Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS


  1. Sereda LM. 2000. The influence of agrotechnical measures on the yield and quality of soybean seeds in the forest-steppe of Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the 3rd All-Ukrainian Conference. Production, Processing and Use of Soybean for Feed and Food Purposes. Vinnytsia: Institute of Forage UAAS; p. 47-48.

  2. Biliavska LH. 2008. Aspects of adaptive soybean breeding in the context of climate changes. Kormy Kormovyrob: Interdepartmental thematic scientific collection. Vinnytsia,; 61: 10-16.

  3. Hlushan AH. 1998. Reserves to increasing soybean yields. Ahrarna Nauka - Selu: Scientific collection of Podillya State Agrarian and Engineering Academy; 2: 37-38.

  4. Drobitko AV. 2000. Selection of varieties and agrotechnical methods of soybean cultivation in the southwestern steppe. Zb. Nauk. Pr. Inst Zemlerob. Кyiv; 1: 73-79.

  5. Babich AO, Babich-Poberezhna AA. 2011. Soybean breeding, production, trade and use in the world. Кyiv: Ahrarna Nauka; 548 p.

  6. Babich AO. 2018. Soybean varietal resources: [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 20]; Available from:  http://a7d.com.ua/plants/6352-sortov-resursi-soyi.html.

  7. Catalog of plant varieties suitable for dissemination in Ukraine in 2018. 2018. Kyiv: Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination; 447 p.

  8. Kobyzeva LN, Riabchun VK, Bezuhla OM. 2004. Extended harmonized classifier of the genus Glycine max. (L.) Merr. Kharkiv; 38 p.

  9. Volkodav VV. 2001. Method of the state variety trials of agricultural crops. Issue 3 (oil, technical, textile and forage crops). Kyiv: Alefa; 76 p.

  10. Maliarchuk MP, Kovalenko AM, Borovik VO, Tyshchenko OD, Basalii HH, Kobylina NO, Klubuk VV. 2014. Vozhegova RA, editor. Method of field and laboratory investigations on irrigated lands. Kherson: Hrin D.S.; 286 p.

  11. Leshchenko AK., Mikhaylov VG. 1978. Soybean. Breeding of technical and fodder crops. Kiev: Urozhay; p.70-86.

  12. Xinhai L, Jinling W, Qingkai Y, Shaojie J, Liming W. 1999. The effect of the selection method on the association of yield and seed protein with agronomic characters in an interspecific cross of soybean. Soybean Genetics Newsleter. 1999. Februery,26 [Online journaj]. [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 15]; Available from: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ soybeangenetics/

  13. Korsakov NI, Rigin BV. 1980. Genetic analysis of qualitative characteristics of plants (methodical instructions). Leningrad: VIR, 30 p.

  14. Korsakov NI. 1972. Identification of soybean species and varieties (methodical instructions). Leningrad: All-Union Research Institute of Plant Production; 189 p.

  15. Horsun IA, Lavrova HD, Sichkar VI. 2010. Targeted selection of parent pairs to create new soybean starting material. Zb Nauk Pr SGI-NTsNS.; 15 (55): 39-51.

  16. Kokhaniuk NV. 2014. Evaluation of soybean varieties based on correlation between quantitative characteristics and indices. Visnyk TsNZ APV Kharkiv Obl.17: 112-116.




Goal. The study of introduced soybean samples to isolate genetic sources of the main biological and economically valuable traits for further use in the breeding process.

Results and Discussion. The article highlights the results of research for 2016-2018. study of introduced soybean samples for a complex of economically valuable traits. The samples origin from Ukraine (17), Canada (.), Australia, France (2 each) and the USA (1 sample). According to the results of the research, the sources of valuable economic traits were identified: with very short growing season, seedlings-full ripeness (98 days) –Marysia (UKR), short (101 – 120 days) – 14 samples; yield excess in relation to the standard – 6 samples. Among the varieties studied in 2018 for ultra-ripeness and yield, the Samorodok and Zhemchuzhyna varieties were stood out. The level of relationships between the main elements of sample productivity has been established. Common to all varieties was the closest connection between the number of seeds per plant and productivity, which was within r = 0.76 – 0.97, exept Triada varietiy. A close correlation between productivity and the number of nodes (r = 0.91) was established for the Samorodok variety,  between productivity and the diameter of the first interstice (r = 0.93) – for the Feieriia variety. The established level of links between the main elements of the productivity of samples, which are planned to be used later in the breeding work, for the development of a model of varieties.

Conclusions. Attraction of new soybean samples to the collection, their study and application in the selection process is the way to create high-yielding, adapted to irrigated growing conditions, resistant to diseases and the occurrence of soybean varieties that meet the requirements of producers.


introduced samples, soybean, productivity elements, correlation, irrigation conditions